Press release

“Everyone loved him”; Wife pays tribute to husband killed working at advertising printing company, as firm fined £400,000 for health and safety breaches

An advertising printing company in Cardiff has been fined £400,000 after a maintenance worker suffered fatal injuries while attempting to repair an industrial overhead door.

On 5 September 2022, 59-year-old Anthony (“Tony”) Webb, an employee of GNW 2023 Realisations Limited, was carrying out maintenance work on an electrically operated sectional overhead door at the company’s manufacturing facility in Cardiff.

Mr Webb was attempting to re-tension the door springs using an industrial wrench when the tool slipped. The spring unwound in an uncontrolled manner, causing the wrench to be ejected and strike him. He suffered catastrophic injuries and died the following day.

Tony and his wife Ewelina

In a victim personal statement, Tony’s wife Ewelina said:

“It is still very raw, and I feel like I am on a roller coaster. I still find it difficult to talk about Tony without breaking down crying.

“Tony and I were together 24/7. Tony liked fixing and repairing things for friends and neighbours. He was a cheeky chap, everyone loved him.

“I still meet up with Tony’s friends who are my friends also. I find it difficult when we talk about things and Tony isn’t there to experience it.

“Every day when I wake up it is like a cloud hanging over me. Some days I just cry without knowing I am going to.”

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the company had failed to adequately maintain the electrically operated sectional overhead doors at the site despite two previous incidents involving failing doors that had injured employees.

The investigation found the company had not implemented a programme of routine inspection or preventative maintenance, allowing the doors to deteriorate into a poor condition.

HSE also found that Mr Webb had repeatedly been permitted to carry out repairs to the doors despite not being suitably trained to undertake the work. The company had failed to carry out a suitable risk assessment, establish a safe system of work, or provide appropriate tools and equipment.

HSE guidance states that powered sectional overhead doors are classed as work equipment and must comply with the requirements of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER). Equipment must be suitable for use, maintained in a safe condition and inspected by a competent person to ensure it remains safe.

Further guidance can be found here: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) – HSE.

GNW 2023 Realisations Limited, of Avenue Industrial Estate, Croescadarn Close, Cardiff, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and Regulation 5(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.

The company was fined £400,000 and ordered to pay £17,854 in costs at Merthyr Tydfil Magistrates’ Court on 17 June 2026.

HSE Inspector Georgina Bennett said:

“This incident was entirely avoidable. The maintenance of industrial doors is a high-risk activity involving stored energy within door springs;  it requires  specialist equipment and should only be carried out by people who are properly trained.

“This company failed to recognise those risks, and despite two previous incidents involving overhead doors, had not carried out regular maintenance to detect and deal with the deterioration in their condition.

“Were it not for these failures, Tony Webb’s death could have been prevented. Our thoughts remain with his loved ones as they mourn his loss.

This HSE prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer Alan Hughes.

 

Further information:

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.
  2. More information about the legislation referred to in this case is available.
  3. Further details on the latest HSE news releases is available.
  4. Relevant guidance can be found here: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) – HSE
  5. HSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed. Relevant sentencing guidelines must be followed unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.  The sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences can be found here.

————————————————————————————————————————————————

“Roedd pawb yn ei garu”; Mae gwraig yn talu teyrnged i’w gŵr a laddwyd wrth weithio mewn cwmni argraffu hysbysebu, wrth i’r cwmni gael dirwy o £400,000 am dorri rheolau iechyd a diogelwch breaches

Mae cwmni argraffu hysbysebu yng Nghaerdydd wedi cael dirwy o £400,000 ar ôl i weithiwr cynnal a chadw ddioddef anafiadau angheuol wrth geisio atgyweirio drws uwchben diwydiannol.

Ar 5 Medi 2022, roedd Anthony (“Tony”) Webb, 59 oed, gweithiwr i GNW 2023 Realisations Limited, yn gwneud gwaith cynnal a chadw ar ddrws uwchben adrannol a weithredir yn drydanol yng nghyfleuster gweithgynhyrchu’r cwmni yng Nghaerdydd.

Roedd Mr Webb yn ceisio ail-densiynu sbringiau’r drws gan ddefnyddio tyndro diwydiannol pan lithrodd yr offeryn. Datododd y sbring mewn modd afreolus, gan achosi i’r tyndro gael ei daflu allan a’i daro. Dioddefodd anafiadau trychinebus a bu farw’r diwrnod canlynol.

Mewn datganiad personol dioddefwr, dywedodd gwraig Tony, Ewelina:

Mae’n dal yn amrwd iawn, ac rwy’n teimlo fel fy mod i ar ffigar-êt. Rwy’n dal yn ei chael hi’n anodd siarad am Tony heb dorri i lawr yn crio.

“Roedd Tony a minnau gyda’n gilydd 24/7. Roedd Tony yn hoffi trwsio ac atgyweirio pethau i ffrindiau a chymdogion. Roedd yn ddyn chwareus, roedd pawb yn ei garu.

“Rwy’n dal i gyfarfod â ffrindiau Tony sydd hefyd yn ffrindiau i mi. Rwy’n ei chael hi’n anodd pan rydyn ni’n siarad am bethau ac nad yw Tony yno i’w brofi.

“Bob dydd pan fyddaf yn deffro mae fel cwmwl yn hongian drosof. Rhai dyddiau rwy’n crio heb wybod fy mod i’n mynd i wneud hynny.”

Canfu ymchwiliad gan yr Awdurdod Gweithredol Iechyd a Diogelwch (HSE) fod y cwmni wedi methu â chynnal a chadw’r drysau uwchben adrannol trydanol ar y safle yn ddigonol er gwaethaf dau ddigwyddiad blaenorol yn ymwneud â drysau’n methu a oedd wedi anafu cyflogeion.

Canfu’r ymchwiliad nad oedd y cwmni wedi gweithredu rhaglen o archwilio rheolaidd na chynnal a chadw ataliol, gan ganiatáu i’r drysau ddirywio i gyflwr gwael.

Canfu’r HSE hefyd fod Mr Webb wedi cael caniatâd dro ar ôl tro i wneud atgyweiriadau i’r drysau er nad oedd wedi’i hyfforddi’n addas i wneud y gwaith. Roedd y cwmni wedi methu â chynnal asesiad risg addas, sefydlu system waith ddiogel, na darparu offer a chyfarpar priodol.

Mae canllawiau’r HSE yn nodi bod drysau uwchben adrannol â phŵer yn cael eu dosbarthu fel cyfarpar gwaith a rhaid iddynt gydymffurfio â gofynion Rheoliadau Darparu a Defnyddio Cyfarpar Gwaith 1998 (PUWER). Rhaid i gyfarpar fod yn addas i’w ddefnyddio, wedi’i gynnal mewn cyflwr diogel a’i archwilio gan berson cymwys i sicrhau ei fod yn parhau i fod yn ddiogel.

Gellir dod o hyd i ganllawiau pellach yma:  Rheoliadau Darparu a Defnyddio Cyfarpar Gwaith 1998 (PUWER) – HSE.

Plediodd GNW 2023 Realisations Limited, o Ystad Ddiwydiannol Avenue, Clos Croescadarn, Caerdydd, yn euog i dorri Adran 2(1) o Ddeddf Iechyd a Diogelwch yn y Gwaith ac ati 1974 a Rheoliad 5(1) o Reoliadau Darparu a Defnyddio Cyfarpar Gwaith 1998.

Cafodd y cwmni ddirwy o £400,000 a gorchymyn i dalu £17,854 mewn costau yn Llys Ynadon Merthyr Tudful ar 17 Mehefin 2026.

Dywedodd Arolygydd yr HSE Georgina Bennett:

“Roedd modd osgoi’r digwyddiad hwn yn llwyr. Mae cynnal a chadw drysau diwydiannol yn weithgaredd risg uchel sy’n cynnwys ynni wedi’i storio mewn sbringiau drysau; mae angen offer arbenigol arno a dim ond pobl sydd wedi’u hyfforddi’n iawn ddylai ei wneud.

“Methodd y cwmni hwn â nodi’r risgiau hynny, ac er gwaethaf dau ddigwyddiad blaenorol yn ymwneud â drysau uwchben, nid oeddent wedi cynnal gwaith cynnal a chadw rheolaidd i ganfod a delio â’r dirywiad yn eu cyflwr.

“Oni bai am y methiannau hyn, gellid bod wedi atal marwolaeth Tony Webb. Mae ein meddyliau’n parhau gyda’i anwyliaid wrth iddynt alaru am ei golled.

Dygwyd yr erlyniad HSE hwn gan y cyfreithiwr gorfodi HSE Alan Hughes.

 

Nodiadau i Olygyddion

 

  1. Yr Awdurdod Gweithredol Iechyd a Diogelwch (HSE) yw rheoleiddiwr cenedlaethol Prydain ar gyfer iechyd a diogelwch yn y gweithle. Rydym wedi ymrwymo i amddiffyn pobl a lleoedd, a helpu pawb i fyw bywydau mwy diogel ac iachach.
  2. Mae rhagor o wybodaeth am y ddeddfwriaeth y cyfeirir ati yn yr achos hwn ar gael.
  3. Mae rhagor o fanylion am ddatganiadau newyddion diweddaraf yr HSE ar gael.
  4. Gellir dod o hyd i ganllawiau perthnasol yma: Rheoliadau Darparu a Defnyddio Cyfarpar Gwaith 1998 (PUWER) – HSE
  5. Nid yw HSE yn rhoi dedfrydau, yn gosod canllawiau nac yn casglu unrhyw ddirwyon a osodir. Rhaid dilyn canllawiau dedfrydu perthnasol oni bai bod y llys yn fodlon y byddai’n groes i fuddiannau cyfiawnder gwneud hynny. Gellir dod o hyd i’r canllawiau dedfrydu ar gyfer troseddau iechyd a diogelwch yma.

Company fined after operative receives fatal head injury at work

A South Yorkshire wire company has been sentenced following serious health and safety breaches that resulted in the death of one its workers.

David Lockwood, 45, sustained fatal injuries at Stanley Wire Limited’s site on Talbot Road in Penistone on 18 November 2021.

Sheffield Magistrates’ Court heard how Mr Lockwood died after becoming entangled in an unguarded wire drawing and recoiling machine. The machine, known as a ‘Gravity Block’, had exposed moving parts which the worker was able to access.

The machine, known as a ‘Gravity Block’

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the company had failed to take effective measures to prevent employees from accessing dangerous moving parts of the wire drawing machine. The investigation identified that the company should have carried out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment for the machine, and subsequently developed a safe system of work and clearly communicated this to its workforce.

HSE also found that fixed closed guards, interlocks or pressure mats should have been installed to prevent operatives from entering the Gravity Block while it was rotating. The company could have appointed a designated competent person on site and provided formal training to operatives, rather than relying on verbal instruction.

Recognised industry-standard safety measures could and should have been implemented on a number of machines, instead of allowing substandard conditions to persist over a prolonged period.

HSE has detailed guidance on the safe use of work equipment and machinery guarding, including the requirements under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER), which is available at: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) – HSE

Stanley Wire Limited, of Stanley Mills, Talbot Road, Penistone, South Yorkshire, after pleading guilty at an early hearing of breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. The company was fined £140,000 and ordered to pay £6,652 in costs at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on 22 January.

After the hearing, HSE Inspector Charlotte Bligh said:

“Following the incident, eight Prohibition Notices were served on the company. The remedial action taken demonstrated that appropriate measures, such as effective guarding, were readily available and could have been put in place had the risks associated with the activity been properly considered.

“Companies are reminded that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required health and safety standards.”

This HSE prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer, Matthew Reynolds and paralegal officer, Benjamin Stobbart.

 

Further information:

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.
  2. More information about the legislation referred to in this case is available.
  3. Further details on the latest HSE news releases is available.
  4. Relevant guidance can be found here: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) – HSE
  5. HSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed.

Animal feed manufacturer fined £500,000 after worker seriously injured

A Yorkshire animal feed manufacturer has been fined £500,000 after a worker lost part of his foot when it was entangled in machinery.

William Thompson (York) Limited pleaded guilty after failing to prevent access to a rotating auger – a tool consisting of a central shaft with a blade wrapped around it – which is designed to transport excess feed away from a press.

The pressing machine at the factory

The 41-year-old had been working as a supervisor at the company’s Jubilee Mill site in York on 14 November 2023. At the time of the incident, the man had been trying to resolve a maintenance issue with the machinery. However, he was able to open the press while its parts remained in operation at significant speed. His foot became entangled in the rotating auger and he sustained injuries so serious he remained in hospital for a period of six weeks.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that William Thompson (York) Limited failed to prevent access to dangerous parts of the machinery and also to carry out a suitable risk assessment of the work being done.

A CCTV still shows only two bars of guarding above the auger – this allowed the worker’s foot to slip through to the blade below

HSE guidance states employers must take effective measures to prevent access to dangerous parts of machinery. This will normally be by fixed guarding but where routine access is needed, interlocked guards may be needed to stop the movement of dangerous parts before a person can reach the danger zone. Further guidance can be found here: Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) – HSE.

William Thompson (York) Limited, of Main Street, Malton, North Yorkshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act etc 1974. The company was fined £500,000 and ordered to pay £4,455 in costs at York Magistrates court on 18 November 2025.

HSE Inspector Shauna Halstead said: “This company’s failures resulted in a man sustaining life-changing injuries.

“Too many workers are injured or killed every year because of failures to guard dangerous parts of machinery.

“Companies must implement safe working practices when carrying out maintenance operations.

“We will not hesitate to take action against companies which do not do all they should to keep people safe when working with machinery.

This HSE prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer Arfaq Nabi and paralegal officer Sarah Thomas.

Further information:

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.
  2. More information about the legislation referred to in this case is available.
  3. Further details on the latest HSE news releases is available.
  4. Relevant guidance can be found here Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) – HSE
  5. HSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed. Relevant sentencing guidelines must be followed unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.  The sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences can be found here.