Press release

Company fined for providing false electrical safety certificates for car washes

A company has been fined after it falsely supplied electrical safety certificates to two car wash businesses in Runcorn, despite them both being declared unsafe.

Inspectors from Britain’s workplace regulator – alongside colleagues from Cheshire Police, Trading Standards and the immigration authorities – carried out an investigation into the activities of Super Hand Car Wash on Halton Road and Top Star Hand Car Wash on Bridge Street.

Both premises were found to have electrical systems that were dangerous. This resulted in Health and Safety Executive (HSE) inspectors taking enforcement action against both businesses – forcing them to immediately stop work. The car wash owners were advised to use a National Inspection Council for Electrical Installation Contracting (NICEIC) registered electrical contractor or similar, to ensure that electrics were made safe to ensure the safety of the public and the people working on site.

Epco Energy Solutions Limited, who were at the time, members of the NICEIC were engaged to carry out the work and certified the installations as being safe to use.

However, an examination of the certificates by one of HSE’s specialist electrical inspectors found that details in them did not match the installations he found on site.  A subsequent visit to both car washes found that the installations were still dangerous and presented a risk of serious injury or electrocution to those on site, including members of the public.

The Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 require all electrical installations to be maintained in a safe condition. This means that systems should only be worked on by someone who is a competent electrical contractor.  The NICEIC is one of the certification bodies for electrical contractors in the UK.  Membership of such a body indicates that the member has received appropriate training, and has been assessed to ensure that they are competent to carry out work on electrical systems. HSE guidance on electrical safety is available. Electrical safety – HSE

Epco Energy Solutions Limited had visited and provided electronically generated certificates using the NICEIC secure members only systems. Certificates provided to the car washes indicated that the electrical systems on site were safe to use when they were not.  With support from the NICEIC it was found that the certificates had been generated using password protected software and electronically signed with sole Epco Director Mohammed Naeem’s signature.

Epco Energy Solutions Limited, of Unit B, 37 Worlsey Road, Eccles, Manchester, were found guilty after a trial at Warrington Magistrates Court on 2 September 2026, of breaching section 3(1) of the Health and Safety At Work Act 1974 etc, 1974. The company was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £15,239 at the same court on 22 October 2026.

HSE inspector Rose Leese-Weller said:

“Due to having such a close relationship with water, car wash owners must ensure that their electrical installations are maintained in a safe condition.

“As well as being safe to use they must also be fit for purpose so as to prevent serious personal injury or electrocution to anyone in the vicinity.

“These car washes where dangerous and unsafe – to both those working there and to members of the public visiting the sites.

“Electrical installations at all workplaces must be maintained in a safe condition and are safe to use.”

This HSE prosecution was brought by enforcement lawyer Sam Crockett and paralegal officer Hettie Burrows.

 

Further information:

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.
  2. More information about the legislation referred to in this case is available.
  3. Further details on the latest HSE news releases is available.
  4. Relevant guidance can be found here – Electrical safety – HSE.
  5. HSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed. Relevant sentencing guidelines must be followed unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.  The sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences can be found here.

Fine for company after man seriously injured at wind farm

A wind farm management services company has been fined £80,000 after a worker was seriously injured by an electrical flashover.

Natural Power Services Limited had sent the then 38-year-old to carry out maintenance work in an electrical substation within the Tom Nan Clach Wind Farm, near Inverness on 23rd June 2020. His injuries resulted in him sustained life-changing injuries that have required multiple surgeries.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the incident happened following a departure from the prepared switching programme. This meant work was allowed to be carried out on one of the two electrical cabinets while the other remained live, allowing part of the electrical system to be energised during the maintenance work.

The HSE investigation found that had the initial switching programme prepared by Natural Power Services Limited been correctly followed, the incident would not have occurred. The company did not have a suitable system or process in place to check or review switching programmes to ensure that the procedures were correctly observed at all times, or to approve any changes to the initial switching programmes.

Free guidance for employers is available on the HSE website, hse.gov.uk, about electrical safety and managing health and safety.

Natural Power Services Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 3(1) and Section 33(1)(a) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £80,000 at Inverness Sheriff Court on 25 November 2025.

Speaking after the hearing, an HSE spokesperson said: “This was a wholly avoidable incident caused by the failure of the company to implement a safe system of work.

“The company should have ensured there was a suitably rigorous process for checking and reviewing the work. This would have ensured those doing the work were adhering to switching programmes in a manner that was suitable and safe.

This would have been a reasonably practicable measure to address the risks arising from the subsequent introduction of additional parallel works that might interfere with the previously planned switching programme.”

 

Further information:

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.
  2. More information about the legislation referred to in this case is available.
  3. Further details on the latest HSE news releases is available.
  4. HSE guidance about electrical safety and managing health and safety is available.
  5. HSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed. Relevant sentencing guidelines must be followed unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.  The sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences can be found here.